Tales Matta.
Chapter 10 of 10 Why Saudi Arabia bought football

10. Conclusion

The answer to the research question that opened this paper: Saudi Arabia bought football, and golf, and tennis, and boxing, and e-sports, mainly because it is a late rentier state with a demographic clock running against oil's time, one that found in sport a simultaneous instrument of income diversification, domestic entertainment at scale, and legitimacy for a national transition project (Vision 2030) that needs to be sold, first and most urgently, to Saudi citizens themselves, not to the press in London or New York. The most cited rival hypothesis, sportswashing, captures a real part of the phenomenon (there is, indeed, a component of external image in assets like Aramco's sponsorship of FIFA), but it fails the simplest test any causal hypothesis must pass: if international reputation were the dominant goal, the investment should show sensitivity to events that worsen that reputation, and it shows none, for ten years and counting.

This paper's contribution was to bring together, for the first time in a single verified fact bank, the complete portfolio of this investment across eight different sports categories, to test it explicitly against three competing explanations, and to show that the simplest and most morally comfortable explanation (the regime launders its image with oil money) is not the one best supported by the evidence. The best supported explanation is less cinematic and more structural: a country of thirty-six million inhabitants, mostly young, buying entertainment for itself at an unprecedented scale, with the side effect that the whole world watches, comments, and occasionally recoils.

In 2034, when the ball rolls in Riyadh in a ninety two thousand seat stadium, the debate over soft power and sportswashing will remain unresolved, because the question it tries to answer (what the world has come to feel about Saudi Arabia) may never be answered with the rigor the question deserves, but the question this paper set out to answer, the why of the investment, has a more tractable answer, and the evidence consistently points in one direction: look less at the headlines from London and more at the census in Riyadh. It is there, not in the World Cup's box of honor, that the explanation lives.

References

  1. Beblawi, H., & Luciani, G. (Eds.). (1987). The Rentier State. Croom Helm.
  2. Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2015). Soft power and soft disempowerment: Qatar, global sport and football's 2022 World Cup finals. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 703–719.
  3. Callamard, A. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions: Investigation into the unlawful death of Mr. Jamal Khashoggi (A/HRC/41/36). United Nations Human Rights Council.
  4. Chadwick, S. (2022). From utilitarianism and neoclassical sport management to a new geopolitical economy of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 22(5), 685–704.
  5. Chadwick, S., Widdop, P., & Goldman, M. (Eds.). (2023). The Geopolitical Economy of Sport: Power, Politics, Money, and the State. Routledge.
  6. Dorsey, J. M. (2016). The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer. Oxford University Press / Hurst.
  7. Gray, M. (2011). A theory of "late rentierism" in the Arab states of the Gulf (CIRS Occasional Paper No. 7). Center for International and Regional Studies, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar.
  8. Grix, J., & Brannagan, P. M. (2016). Of mechanisms and myths: Conceptualising states' "soft power" strategies through sports mega-events. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(2), 251–272.
  9. Grix, J., Brannagan, P. M., & Houlihan, B. (2015). Interrogating states' soft power strategies: A case study of sports mega-events in Brazil and the UK. Global Society, 29(3), 463–479.
  10. Grix, J., Brannagan, P. M., et al. (2024). Sports mega-events as foreign policy: Sport diplomacy, "soft power," and "sportswashing." American Behavioral Scientist, 68(10), 1419–1438.
  11. Grix, J., & Lee, D. (2013). Soft power, sports mega-events and emerging states: The lure of the politics of attraction. Global Society, 27(4), 521–536.
  12. Hertog, S. (2010). Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Cornell University Press.
  13. Krzyzaniak, J. (2016). The soft power strategy of soccer sponsorships. Soccer & Society, 19(4), 498–515.
  14. Murray, S. (2018). Sports Diplomacy: Origins, Theory and Practice. Routledge.
  15. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
  16. Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109.
  17. Peterson, J. E. (2006). Qatar and the world: Branding for a micro-state. Middle East Journal, 60(4), 732–748.
  18. Reiche, D. (2015). Investing in sporting success as a domestic and foreign policy tool: The case of Qatar. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(4), 489–504.
  19. Fontes factuais e comunicados oficiais:
  20. Aramco. (2024, abril 25). Aramco and FIFA announce global partnership. aramco.com.
  21. ATP Tour. (2024, fevereiro). ATP and PIF announce strategic partnership. atptour.com.
  22. Deloitte. (2023). Saudi Pro League clubs spend US$957 million in record-breaking football transfer window.
  23. Formula 1. (2020). Formula 1 announces long-term global partnership with Aramco.
  24. Newcastle United F.C. (2023, junho). Newcastle United and Sela agree multi-year front-of-shirt partnership.
  25. Play the Game. (2025). The Public Investment Fund's growing sports portfolio.
  26. Saudi Press Agency. (2024). Coverage of Riyadh Season boxing events.
  27. Vision 2030. (2016). Official document. vision2030.gov.sa.
← Previous chapter9. Limitations End of analysisAll analysis →
← All analysis Get it every week